Skip to main content
Home

GEF Logo

GEF Logo

GEF Logo

Search
  • Who We Are

    Organization

    • Overview
    • CEO and Chairperson
    • Focal Points
    • Secretariat Staff

    GEF Council

    • Members & Alternates
    • Work Programs
    • Meetings
    • Decisions

    Funding

    • Overview
    • GEF-8 Replenishment
    • GEF-7 Replenishment
    • Replenishment Documents
    • Overview
    • CEO and Chairperson
    • Focal Points
    • Secretariat Staff
  • What We Do

    Topics

    Topics

    • Amazon
    • Biodiversity
    • Blended Finance
    • Chemicals and Waste
    • Climate Change
    • Food Security
    • Forests
    • Illegal Wildlife Trade
    • International Waters
    • Land Degradation
    • Least Developed Countries Fund
    • Mercury
    • Special Climate Change Fund
    • Sustainable Cities
    • View All Topics >>

    Stakeholder Engagement

    Stakeholder Engagement

    • Civil Society Organizations
    • Country Support Program
    • Gender
    • Indigenous Peoples
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • Private Sector
  • Projects & Operations

    Projects

    Projects

    • Project Database
    • Templates
    • How Projects Work

    Countries

    Countries

    • Recipient Countries
    • Donor Countries
    • Participant Countries
    • Country Support Program

    Operations

    Operations

    • Conflict Resolution Commissioner
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • Policies and Guidelines
    • Results
  • Partners

    Partners

    • Countries
    • GEF Agencies
    • Conventions
    • Civil Society Organizations
    • Private Sector
    • Countries
    • GEF Agencies
    • Conventions
    • Civil Society Organizations
    • Private Sector
  • Newsroom

    Newsroom Menu Column 1

    • All
    • News
    • Feature Stories
    • Press Releases
    • Multimedia
    • Publications
    • Blog

    Newsroom Menu Column 2

    • GEF Logo
    • Partner News
    • Newsletter
    • Media Contacts
    • All
    • News
    • Feature Stories
    • Press Releases
    • Multimedia
    • Publications
    • Blog
  • Events
  • Search

Three steps to setting business targets for a healthy Earth

Feature Story
January 11, 2018
shutterstock_670232383.jpg
shutterstock_670232383.jpg

By Kevin Rabinovitch, Global Vice President Sustainability and Chief Climate Officer, Mars

When you go to the doctor for a checkup she measures your weight, blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate and more to assess your health, and compares your numbers to science based benchmarks. If your numbers are off, you put together a plan for getting back on track. Wouldn’t it be great if we had such a checkup to assess the health of the environment that sustains us all?

Thanks to the work of thousands of scientists over many decades, we now have the Planetary Boundaries model, a powerful tool for helping us understand the key indicators of planetary health and the risks we’ve created by neglecting the global commons. More and better data is also coming in all the time about how the decisions we make as companies relate to resource use and environmental impact. Now it’s time to take the next step and work collectively on targets and action plans that allow business to make decisions informed by planetary health measures.

There are at least three challenges to solve in connecting measures for planetary health with the operational metrics that can guide business decisions:

Finding the right metrics

Just as getting on a scale after every bite of food is neither practical nor helpful, measuring the change in the Earth’s energy balance for every business decision doesn’t work either. But quantifying the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions which drive such energy imbalance can be done and applied to every business decision. This idea led to the Science Based Targets initiative, a game changer in corporate GHG targets.

What about the other environmental boundaries? Biodiversity loss is an important limit to consider, but drawing a direct quantitative connection between rates of species extinctions and purchasing decisions doesn’t work. However, some of the drivers of that loss – like the expansion of land used for agriculture – are easy to see and understand as operational metrics for business. More of this type of thinking can help us adapt the other boundaries in similar ways.

Working out your share

In delivering a global target, the only requirements of the science are that everyone sets targets which, when they are all added together, meet the global total. There are many ways to make this allocation, but the pieces must add up to a whole: otherwise we risk missing the overall goal, to our collective suffering. This can be seen, for example, in how the current sum of national climate commitments would not get us below the 2C threshold.

Making the targets actionable

A manageable framework for organising operational metrics is needed. Today’s sustainability metrics are a pile of broken pottery, when what is required is a mosaic. Insight can be drawn from financial metrics: at the management team level, most businesses track three to five key metrics (eg sales, earnings, return on assets, cash), which are largely the same across all companies. The thousands of other financial metrics all have a home somewhere in a structure that quantitatively adds up to those key ones.

Over a period of several years, working with a range of key external partners including the World Resources Institute (WRI), we at Mars have sought to develop the science-based operational metrics that would enable us to do our share in operating within the planet’s boundaries. This past September we announced and committed to them as part of our Sustainable in a Generation Plan. Our targets – on reducing global GHG emissions, using water sustainably, and holding constant the total land area used to grow our ingredients – are our answer to what individual companies should do as part of the collective action that is needed.

We’re excited about this approach – and about the enthusiastic dialogue it has generated inside and outside our business. We’re rolling up our sleeves and getting to work on action plans to drive progress on our new goals. But there are pieces of the puzzle that haven’t yet been worked out – so we are pleased to be part of a team that includes leading thinkers from the Global Environment Facility, the Stockholm Resilience Center, WRI and others working to make science based targets for climate, land, soil health, water – and perhaps other areas – common practice.

By working together, we can turn the current tragedy of the commons into the most meaningful opportunity for a prosperous, sustainable future.

Topics

Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses
Biodiversity
Energy, Food, Water and Ecosystem Nexus
Safeguarding the Global Commons
Related Content

Beyond the Sustainable Development Goals

Multimedia
View All News

Related News

groundwater
News

Water, ecosystems and human development

August 24, 2018
Image
2154336-0.jpg
Publication

A future food system for healthy human beings and a healthy planet

Farmer in millet field
News

The Water, Land and Energy Nexus

January 22, 2016

GEF Logo

Follow Us

GEF Affiliated Sites

  • GEF Portal
  • Independent Evaluation Office
  • Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel
  • Small Grants Programme

Who We Are

  • GEF Secretariat Staff
  • Conflict Resolution Commissioner
  • Council Members & Alternates
  • Focal Points
  • Careers
  • Legal
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Global Environment Facility, All Rights Reserved.  |   Legal