Skip to main content
Home

GEF Logo

GEF Logo

GEF Logo

Search
  • Who We Are

    Organization

    • Overview
    • Focal Points
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Interim CEO

    GEF Council

    • Members & Alternates
    • Work Programs
    • Meetings
    • Decisions

    Funding

    • Overview
    • GEF-9
    • GEF-8
    • GEF-7
    • Replenishment Documents
    • Overview
    • Focal Points
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Interim CEO
  • What We Do

    Topics

    Topics

    • Amazon
    • Biodiversity
    • Blended Finance
    • Food Security
    • Forests
    • Global Biodiversity Framework Fund
    • Illegal Wildlife Trade
    • Integrated Programs
    • International Waters
    • Land Degradation
    • LDCF
    • Mercury
    • Plastics
    • Pollution
    • SCCF
    • Sustainable Cities
    • Transparency
    • View All Topics >>

    Stakeholder Engagement

    Stakeholder Engagement

    • Civil Society Organizations
    • Country Engagement Strategy
    • Fonseca Leadership Program
    • GEF Voices
    • Indigenous Peoples
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • Private Sector
    • Youth
  • Projects & Operations

    Projects

    Projects

    • Project Database
    • Templates
    • How Projects Work

    Countries

    Countries

    • Recipient Countries
    • Donor Countries
    • Participant Countries
    • Country Support Program

    Operations

    Operations

    • Conflict Resolution Commissioner
    • GEF Geospatial Platform
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • Policies and Guidelines
    • Results
  • Partners

    Partners

    • Countries
    • GEF Agencies
    • Conventions
    • Civil Society Organizations
    • Private Sector
    • Countries
    • GEF Agencies
    • Conventions
    • Civil Society Organizations
    • Private Sector
  • Newsroom

    Newsroom Menu Column 1

    • All
    • News
    • Feature Stories
    • Press Releases
    • Multimedia
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • Partner News

    Newsroom Menu Column 2

    • GEF Logo
    • Newsletter
    • Media Contacts
    • All
    • News
    • Feature Stories
    • Press Releases
    • Multimedia
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • Partner News
  • Events
  • Search

Preventing marine hitchhikers

Feature Story
April 18, 2019
The transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species (IAS) through biofouling is a global environmental problem which requires intervention at multiple levels.
The transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species (IAS) through biofouling is a global environmental problem which requires intervention at multiple levels.

Oceans cover 70% of our planet’s surface. Nearly 50% of the world’s population live in coastal areas and the need to protect marine environments transcends individual communities, ecosystems, or nations.

Strong partnerships are vital, to address the multiple problems that threaten healthy ocean life. 

A maritime bioinvasion

Global shipping is an industry that can make substantial contributions to maintaining ocean health.

The world’s commercial shipping fleet consists of approximately 93,000 vessels and is responsible for over 80% of global trade.

Unfortunately, in addition to transferring goods between countries, ships can also be a pathway for the transfer and introduction of aquatic organisms into new environments.

undp_exposure_container_ship_body.jpg
undp_exposure_container_ship_body.jpg

Photo credit: IMO_Lee Adamson

Biofouling: a foul problem

The transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species (IAS) through biofouling is a global environmental problem which requires intervention at multiple levels.

Biofouling is described as the undesirable accumulation of microorganisms, algae, plants, and animals on submerged structures - particularly ships’ hulls. Biofouling often leads to the introduction of IAS into new areas and is considered to be one of the greatest threats to the world’s freshwater, coastal, and marine environments.

A multitude of marine species may survive transit and go on to establish a reproductive population in new host environments, becoming invasive, out-competing native species, and multiplying into harmful proportions. 

The introduction of invasive aquatic organisms into new marine environments not only affects biodiversity and ecosystem health, but also has measurable negative effects on a number of economic sectors such as fisheries, aquaculture, and tourism.

Biofouling has significant production impacts in the aquaculture industry, such as physical damage of stock, biological competition and infrastructure damage - consistently estimated between 5-10% of production costs, equivalent to USD 1.5 to 3 billion per year globally.

Biofouling can also substantially reduce the operational energy efficiency of a ship - by as much as 10-20% - leading to increases in greenhouse gas emissions. So biofouling solutions can make significant contributions to climate change mitigation.

Addressing invasive aquatic species is not just a matter of ensuring the health and integrity of marine ecosystems - ultimately it is about safeguarding ecosystem services that sustain the livelihoods of coastal communities across the globe.

undp_exposure_fisherman.jpg
undp_exposure_fisherman.jpg

Because of its technical, scientific, environmental, and economic implications, the biofouling issue is one of the most complex ecosystem degradation threats faced by countries and marine ecosystems.

Fighting bioinvasion

In direct response, an exciting project, the first-ever globally co-ordinated effort to address biofouling from all marine sectors - Building Partnerships to Assist Developing Countries to Minimize the Impacts from Aquatic Biofouling (GloFouling Partnerships) - kicked off in March 2019.

Financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), and supported by UNDP, the International Maritime Organization (IMO)-executed GloFouling Partnerships project will address bioinvasions by organisms which can build up on ships’ hulls and other mobile marine structures.

The project will manage demonstration sites, provide institutional capacity building, and develop awareness-raising campaigns geared to all relevant maritime industries, including recreational boating.

Through a planned ‘Global Industry Alliance’ (GIA), the project will also work closely with shipping and other maritime industries to identify and test biofouling solutions and technologies, catalysing research and development, sharing ideas and best practices, and promoting ‘win/win’ solutions for a sustainable blue economy.

Working together to protect the world's oceans

The twelve countries spearheading the work of the GloFouling project represent a mix of developing nations and Small Island Developing States: Brazil, Ecuador, Fiji, Indonesia, Jordan, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Tonga.

Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, and Sweden also contribute to the project as strategic partners. Strong participation from private sector stakeholders is also expected through the GIA.

Some of the next steps expected from the GloFouling project include inaugurating national task forces in the 12 participating countries and launching the GIA as a vehicle for enhanced partnership between the public sector and the maritime industry, as well as the alignment of public, NGO, and commercial activities towards common goals identified by the project.

The GloFouling project is planning over 400 project activities, including 12 technical publications, 12 demonstration sites, six global conferences, 60 training workshops, and a global knowledge hub.

undp_exposure_dirty_engine.jpg
undp_exposure_dirty_engine.jpg

Ocean energy turbine 2. Photo: Garry Fletcher, Lester B. Pearson College.

Reducing friction, saving the planet

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from international shipping in 2012 amounted to 796 million tonnes, accounting for 2.2% of global CO2 emissions.

While a number of activities and sectors contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the dominant contributor is energy consumption via the combustion of fossil fuels (oil, gas, coal), which represents about 65% of global GHG emissions. About a fifth of these emissions (or 14% of global emissions) come from the transport sector (road, rail, air, and maritime).

One important measure to increase the energy efficiency of ships and therefore to reduce CO2 emissions from international shipping is by decreasing the hull roughness associated with biofouling. Without remediation, this roughness increases ships’ frictional resistance and, ultimately, fuel consumption and total GHG emissions.

The solutions advocated by the GloFouling project (for example, more effective hull maintenance, reduced fouling rates due to use of advanced hull coatings and timely propeller polishing) have the potential to reduce drag and energy consumption by ships, contributing to a reduction of GHG emissions of anything between 5 to 23%.

Even if a relatively small proportion of these potential emission reductions is achieved, this contribution to reduced GHG emissions by the shipping sector will still represent a significant environmental benefit that will play an important part in climate change mitigation.

Critical action, critical conservation

The health of our oceans depends on all of us – and all of us depend on the health of our ocean.

UNDP, GEF, IMO, IOC-UNESCO, the World Ocean Council and many other partners are working together to protect biodiversity and address climate change by providing technical assistance, policy advice, and governance support to developing countries through the GloFouling project.

The GloFouling project will yield numerous development benefits across multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), by working to conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development (SDG 14), as well as by taking  action to combat climate change and its impacts (SDG 13). 

The GloFouling Project also includes targeted initiatives focusing specifically on women, aimed at creating an empowering space for reducing existing disparities in maritime administration, the scientific community, and the private sector (SDG 5); actions to encourage industry innovation and technology adoption (SDG 9); and specific opportunities for South-South, North-South and triangular cooperation at the public and private sector levels (SDG 17).


This story was originally published on Exposure by UNDP Ecosystems and Biodiversity.

For more information on the project, please visit here.

Topics

Biodiversity
International Waters

Partners

United Nations Development Programme

Related News

Collage of Ile-Alatau Mountains
Blog

What searching for snow leopards taught me about hope

January 6, 2026
Press Release

GEF aprueba una financiación de 372 millones de USD para hacer frente a desafíos medioambientales en todo el mundo y se prepara para un nuevo ciclo de inversiones

December 19, 2025
Press Release

GEF approuve un financement de 372 millions de dollars pour relever les défis environnementaux à travers le monde et se prépare à un nouveau cycle d’investissements

December 19, 2025

GEF Logo

Follow Us

GEF Affiliated Sites

  • GEF Portal
  • Independent Evaluation Office
  • Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel
  • Small Grants Program

Who We Are

  • GEF Secretariat Staff
  • Conflict Resolution Commissioner
  • Council Members & Alternates
  • Focal Points
  • Careers
  • Legal
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Global Environment Facility, All Rights Reserved.  |   Legal